MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000923560 · doi:10.1080/10916460902936960

The Solubility of Asphaltenes in Different Hydrocarbon Liquids

2010· article· en· W2000923560 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePetroleum Science and Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorCape Breton University
KeywordsAsphalteneMiscibilityNaphthaTolueneSolventHydrocarbonSolubilityChemistryPhenanthreneHildebrand solubility parameterAsphaltPrecipitationChemical engineeringHexaneOrganic chemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bitumen miscibility in low-molecular-weight hydrocarbon liquids was evaluated. The presence of toluene in bitumen–solvent blends improved bitumen miscibility and led to the delay in onset of asphaltenes precipitation due to the dipole–dipole and heteromolecular interactions. For heavy naphtha, the results showed reduced asphaltenes precipitation and enthalpy of mixing due to strong hydrogen bonding and moderate homomolecular interactions. Hexane and light naphtha systems showed higher heats of mixing and higher asphaltenes precipitation due to homomolecular interactions. The best miscibility characteristics of heavy petroleum were obtained with aromatic solvents and solvent mixtures that contained increasing composition of toluene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it