Pratiques des infirmières des Centres locaux de services communautaires du Québec de prévention et promotion en santé du cœur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Afin de caractériser les pratiques infirmières de prévention et de promotion de la santé du cœur dans 20 CLSC québécois, une approche qualitative (n = 47 infirmières) et une approche quantitative (n = 177 infirmières et n = 3 802 usagers) ont été retenues pour recueillir l’information. Les résultats montrent que, malgré une perception positive de prévention exprimée par les infirmières, la réalité de la prévention et de la promotion souligne des lacunes dans la pratique quotidienne des infirmières. Le défi majeur de prévention et promotion est de consolider la place de la prévention secondaire dans la pratique quotidienne des infirmières et surtout d’intégrer la prévention primaire et la promotion dans leur pratique clinique quotidienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".