Significance of “gneissic” rocks in the Liscomb Complex, Nova Scotia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Liscomb Complex comprises Late Devonian intrusive rocks (principally peraluminous granite) and medium- to high-grade metamorphic rocks (“gneisses”) that collectively are hosted by low-grade (greenschist facies) metasediments of the Cambro-Ordovician Meguma Group. The conventional view that these “gneisses” contain high-grade mineral assemblages and represent basement rocks has recently been challenged, and indeed, some of the rocks previously mapped as gneisses, particularly metapelites, have isotopic compositions resembling the Meguma Group. Amphibole-bearing enclaves in the Liscomb plutons, however, are isotopically distinct and in this regard resemble xenoliths of basement gneisses in the Popes Harbour lamprophyre dyke, south of the Liscomb area. Metasedimentary enclaves with Meguma isotopic signatures can contain garnets with unzoned cores (implying high temperatures) that host high-grade minerals (prismatic sillimanite, spinel, and (or) corundum) and are enclosed by retrograde-zoned rims. These features are interpreted here as having formed during and following the attainment of peak temperatures related to Liscomb magmatism. The amphibole-bearing meta-igneous rocks described here contain cummingtonite or hornblendic amphibole and occur as enclaves in granodioritic to tonalitic plutons. They are mineralogically, texturally, and isotopically distinct from Meguma metasediments and at least some of the plutonic rocks that enclose them, so remain the most likely candidate for basement rocks in the Liscomb Complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".