MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000978919 · doi:10.1242/jeb.047431

The control of breathing in goldfish (<i>Carassius auratus</i>) experiencing thermally induced gill remodelling

2010· article· en· W2000978919 on OpenAlexafffund
Velislava Tzaneva, Steve F. Perry

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of OttawaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsCarassius auratusChemoreceptorBiologyAnatomyHypoxia (environmental)Fish <Actinopterygii>Respiratory systemVentilation (architecture)Internal medicineChemistryOxygenBiochemistryMedicineFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At temperatures below 15°C the gill lamellae of goldfish (Carassius auratus) are largely covered by an interlamellar cell mass (ILCM) which decreases the functional surface area of the gill. The presence of the ILCM in goldfish acclimated to cold water conceivably could lead to a covering of the neuroepithelial cells (NECs), which are believed to be important for sensing ambient O₂ and CO₂ levels. In this study we tested the hypothesis that goldfish with covered lamellae (and presumably fewer NECs exposed to the water) exhibit a decreased capacity to hyperventilate in response to hypoxic stimuli. Measurements of ventilation amplitude and frequency were performed during exposure to acute hypoxia (P(w(O₂))=30 mmHg) or following injections of the O₂ chemoreceptor stimulant NaCN into the buccal cavity or caudal vein of fish acclimated to 25°C (uncovered lamellae) or 7°C (covered lamellae) to stimulate predominantly the externally or internally oriented NECs, respectively. The results demonstrated no significant differences in the response to hypoxia, with each group exhibiting similar percentage increases in ventilation amplitude (90-91%) and frequency (34-43%). Similarly, with the exception of a rightward shift of the ventilation frequency dose-response in the fish acclimated to 7°C, there were no significant differences between the two groups of fish in the ED(50) values. These findings suggest that goldfish with covered lamellae retain the capacity to sense external hypoxic stimuli. Using immunohistochemistry to identify serotonin-enriched NECs, it was demonstrated that the presence of the ILCM results in the NECs being redistributed towards the distal regions of the lamellae. In 25°C-acclimated fish, the NECs were distributed evenly along the length of the lamellae with 53±3% of them in the distal half, whereas in fish acclimated to 7°C, 83±5% of the NECs were confined to the distal half. Using the neuronal marker antibody ZN-12, it was demonstrated that the NECs at the distal edges of the lamellae are innervated by nerve fibres. Thus, it is hypothesised that the capacity to sense external hypoxic stimuli in goldfish acclimated to cold water is maintained despite the increasing coverage of the gill epithelial surfaces because of a redistribution of innervated NECs to the exposed distal regions of the lamellae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BiologySame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207