MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000992901 · doi:10.1258/0004563021901856

Role of bile acid measurement in pregnancy

2002· review· en· W2000992901 on OpenAlexaff
Ian Walker, Catherine Nelson‐Piercy, Catherine Williamson

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBile acidMedicinePregnancyCholestasisFetusItchingAlanine aminotransferaseObstetricsInternal medicineGastroenterologyPhysiologySurgeryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The diagnosis of obstetric cholestasis (OC) has serious implications for maternal, and especially fetal, health. Total serum bile acid concentration is an important investigation in any woman with itching in the absence of a rash during pregnancy. Results should be available within 1-2 working days. Pruritus plus raised total bile acids in the third trimester suggests a diagnosis of OC. Other biochemical abnormalities, usually a raised alanine aminotransferase, accompany or follow the finding of raised bile acids. Bile acids are sensitive, but not specific, markers for OC. The diagnosis is one of exclusion. The clinician should remain alert to other causes of liver dysfunction, either specific to pregnancy or not. Effective treatment is available that improves maternal biochemical indices and well-being. It is not clear whether such treatment reduces the risks to the fetus. More active management of OC pregnancies has reduced the associated fetal and perinatal mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.202
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations85
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory MedicineSame topicDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsFrench-language works237,207