MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001007885 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2013.2259152

A Novel Two-Axis Theory-Based Experimental Approach Towards Determination of Magnetization Characteristics of Line-Start Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines

2013· article· en· W2001007885 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaomin Lu, K. Lakshmi Varaha Iyer, Kaushik Mukherjee, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetComputer scienceSynchronization (alternating current)MagnetizationLine (geometry)Saturation (graph theory)Synchronous motorControl theory (sociology)Mechanical engineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligenceMagnetic fieldMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the importance of saturation of parameters in line-start permanent magnet synchronous machine (LSPMSM) and the scanty available research literature on simplistic methods of determining the magnetizing characteristics of LSPMSM, this paper proposes a novel and yet simplistic approach towards its determination. Experimental investigations have been performed on a laboratory LSPMSM based on the proposed dq axis (two-axis)-based methodology and the measured magnetization characteristics of the machine has been incorporated into the machine model. The measured characteristics have hence been validated through dynamic and steady state performance analyses of the machine under direct online (DOL) starting. Furthermore, performance analysis of the machine has also been performed through the developed machine model with and without incorporating the magnetization characteristics of the machine to elicit the effects of parameter saturation during startup and synchronization of the machine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207