Limits on the luminosity function of Ly<i>α</i>emitters at<i>z</i>= 7.7
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims. The Lyα luminosity function (LF) of high-redshift Lyα emitters (LAEs) is one of the few observables of the re-ionization epoch accessible with 8–10 m class telescopes. The evolution of the LAE LF with redshift is dependent upon the physical evolution of LAEs and the ionisation state of the Universe towards the end of the Dark Ages.Methods. We performed a narrow-band imaging program at 1.06 μm using CFHT/WIRCam. The observations target Lyα emitters at redshift z ~ 7.7 in the CFHT-LS D1 field. From these observations we derived a photometric sample of 7 LAE candidates at z ~ 7.7. Results. We derive luminosity functions for the full sample of seven objects and for subsamples of four objects. Assuming the brightest objects in our sample are real, we find that the resulting luminosity function is not consistent with previous work at lower redshifts. More definitive conclusions will require spectroscopic confirmation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".