MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001025435 · doi:10.1109/aps.2004.1330614

Compact visualization of electromagnetic time-harmonic fields

2004· article· en· W2001025435 on OpenAlex
J.E. Roy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicScientific Research and Discoveries
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisualizationCartesian coordinate systemPlot (graphics)EllipseHarmonic analysisElectromagnetic fieldHarmonicPolarization (electrochemistry)Analytic geometryComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsGeometryMathematical analysisPhysicsAcousticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a compact visualization scheme for electromagnetic time-harmonic fields, which replaces the visualization of six plots with that of a single plot. These six plots are those of the magnitude and the phase for the three Cartesian field components of interest (either electric or magnetic) at the points of a computational space. The single plot shows in three dimensional space the lengths and the orientations of both the major and the minor axes for the general polarization ellipse that corresponds to the six plots. This compact visualization is especially useful for the near field which often has all three components non-zero. This compact visualization scheme can also be extended from time-harmonic signals to arbitrary time signals by using the concept of analytic signals as the generalization of complex numbers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScientific Research and DiscoveriesFrench-language works237,207