EFFECT OF METHOCEL AS A WATER BINDER ON THE LINEAR VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES OF MOZZARELLA CHEESE DURING EARLY STAGES OF MATURATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changes in the dynamic and transient rheological character of highmoisture, skim milk (HMSM) Mozzarella cheese due to the addition of 0.2% Methocel (methyl cellulose) as a water binder at room (25C) and refrigeration (7C) temperatures during early stages of maturation (1, 5, 7, and 14 days after manufacture) were investigated. The HMSM Mozzarella with 0.2% Methocel was softer (lower dynamic storage and loss modulus, and higher creep and recovery compliance) compared to HMSM Mozzarella without Methocel, due to improved water holding capacity. The age‐dependent frequency dispersions of dynamic mechanical spectra (storage and loss modulus) were fitted to a power‐law model. A six‐element Voigt‐Kelvin mechanistic model described the age‐dependent retardation spectra (compliances, viscosities, and retardation times) obtained from creep experiments. Strong correlation was obtained between the viscoelastic
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".