MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2001061903 · doi:10.1243/09544062jmes1894

Small-scale isotropy of orificed, perforated plate turbulence

2009· article· en· W2001061903 on OpenAlexaff
Arindam Singha

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalingIsotropyTurbulenceTaylor microscaleReynolds numberFlatness (cosmology)PhysicsSkewnessKolmogorov microscalesRange (aeronautics)Scale invarianceK-epsilon turbulence modelStatistical physicsK-omega turbulence modelMechanicsMathematicsGeometryOpticsMaterials scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The small-scale statistics of orificed, perforated plate (OPP) turbulence was studied over a range of Reynolds numbers based on Taylor microscale, Re λ , from 23 to 108. The streamwise velocity skewness, flatness, and the velocity spectra, deduced from hot-wire measurements taken at 70 D (where D is the diameter of the holes of the OPP) downstream of the OPP confirmed the turbulence to be quasi-isotropic. Application of the extended self-similarity concept enabled the analysis of the velocity structure functions of the small-scale statistics up to the sixth order. The ESS analysis revealed a large stretch of scaling region, despite the absence of a perceptible Kolmogorov inertial subrange. The values of the scaling exponents seem to affirm the superiority of the OPP over conventional grid in generating quasi-isotropic turbulence. The effects of Re λ on the extent of the scaling range and the scaling exponent were also explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science→Same topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows→French-language works237,207→