MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001069124 · doi:10.1109/mwc.2013.6549287

Challenges and research opportunities in wireless communication networks for smart grid

2013· article· en· W2001069124 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkQuality of serviceRedundancy (engineering)Wireless mesh networkWireless networkSmart gridWirelessProvisioningDistributed computingWireless WANKey distribution in wireless sensor networksTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article begins with a comprehensive presentation of architecture and essential characteristics of a smart grid communication network (SGCN). Then different types of traffic that an SGCN is anticipated to carry are studied along with their QoS requirements. Subsequently, a number of critical challenges from the wireless technology and networking perspectives are addressed. They include wireless mesh routing and QoS provisioning to efficiently support realtime and non-real-time traffic, intelligent data filtering, and fusion to reduce redundancy and minimize network traffic while ensuring information integrity, optimal network design, and, finally, security concerns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it