MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001082570 · doi:10.7202/030931ar

Immigration et santé publique : Lowell, Massachusetts, 1865‑1890

2006· article· fr· W2001082570 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Martin Tétreault

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Papers · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le XIX' siècle nord-américain a connu plusieurs maladies à caractère épidémique au nombre desquelles il faut compter la variole. Cette dernière maladie, à cause de son taux élevé de létalilé et la célérité avec laquelle elle se propage, soulève la crainte parmi les populations. Les villes industrielles de la Nouvelle-Angleterre devront de toute nécessité organiser la lutte contre ces fléaux. Nous étudions spécialement le cas d'une ville du Massachusetts: Lowell entre 1865 et 1890. Cette dernière ville a dû faire face à la menace permanente d'apparition de la variole en raison du fait qu'elle était le point de destination de nombreux immigrants canadiens en provenance de régions où sévissait la variole à Vétat endémique. À Montréal en 1885, la variole prend soudainement les proportions d'une épidémie. Comme cette ville est reliée au nord-est américain par le réseau ferroviaire, le New Hampshire, l'état le plus immédiatement menacé, organisera conjointement avec le U.S. Marine Hospital Service, la protection des états de la Nouvelle-Angleterre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical PapersSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207