MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transition of cognitively delayed adolescent organ transplant recipients to adult care

2006· review· en· W2001096908 on OpenAlex
Miriam Kaufman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Transplantation · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsychological interventionPromotion (chess)Adult careVocational educationNursingHealth careIndependent livingTransition (genetics)Medical educationYoung adultGerontologyPsychologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transition from pediatric to adult health care is a complicated process that goes far beyond transfer of care. The young person who is intellectually impaired or who must struggle to master daily living skills faces more challenges in this process than other adolescents. Physicians, nurses, social workers, occupational therapists, and other health care providers must work with adolescents, their parents, and teachers to assess abilities and transition needs. Communication skills, capacity for decision making, adherence, vocational and educational issues, sexuality, and relationships should be addressed. Interventions may include the creation of an individualized transition plan, skills training, family counseling, a lengthened transition process, involvement in a support group, health promotion, and teaching of self-care skills. The summary for the adult provider should include information about how best to communicate with the young person and an assessment of capacity to make decisions and self-management skills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it