Morphometrics of the eyes and orbits of the nocturnal Swallow-tailed Gull (Creagrus furcatus)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Swallow-tailed Gull ( Creagrus furcatus (Neboux, 1846)) is known for its nocturnal feeding habits and apparently large eyes. Despite frequent observations of its large eyes, detailed measurements of its eyes and orbits are wanting. Here, we provide a detailed analysis of the size and shape of the eye and orbits of this unique species in relation to a range of other gull species. Although the C. furcatus does have a slightly enlarged cornea and optical axis, neither the transverse orbit diameter nor the shape of its eye differs significantly from other larids. In addition, we found no significant difference between C. furcatus and other gulls in terms of its orbit dimensions and orbit orientation. We therefore conclude that C. furcatus does not possess a transversely enlarged eye, but rather a slightly larger cornea and longer eye. Our results do not, however, preclude the presence of other changes in the visual system, such as retinal morphology or neurophysiology, that could be adaptive for nocturnal feeding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".