The effect of juxtaposition angle on knot reduction in a lattice polygon model of strand passage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A model of local strand passage in self-avoiding polygons (SAPs) on the simple cubic lattice is investigated numerically. The polygons studied, called Θ-SAPs, contain a specific strand-passage structure, called Θ, at a fixed strand-passage site. After-strand-passage knot probabilities are estimated from a Monte Carlo study of unknotted and trefoil Θ-SAPs and the estimates are used here to investigate how knot reduction depends on the local juxtaposition structure at the strand-passage site. In particular, we observe a correlation between knot reduction and the angle of the crossing at the strand-passage site; this same angle has been shown experimentally by Neuman et al (2009 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106 6986–91) to be important in explaining topoisomerase action on DNA. The angle of the crossing is crossing sign dependent, and, from our observations, so is knot reduction; this can be used to understand experimentally observed knot-type chirality biases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".