Delay-Optimal Distributed Scheduling in Multi-User Multi-Relay Cellular Wireless Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a novel scheme for delay-optimal scheduling in multi-user multi-relay cellular wireless networks. The cell area is divided into several sectors, each serviced by an individual relay station (RS). In order to have simultaneous transmissions by the users in neighbouring sectors, we assume that users of each individual sector use separate set of orthogonal channels to communicate with the RS and the base station (BS). Moreover, a separate orthogonal channel is shared among relays for transmission to the BS. For uplink communication, users are allowed to choose between two modes of transmission, namely, direct transmission mode and relayed transmission mode through a simple transmission mode selection algorithm. Users are allocated fractions of the time-slot for the first phase of transmission (from the users to the BS and the RSs) in a time-division multiple access (TDMA) fashion. For the second phase of transmission (from the RSs to the BS), each RS is allocated a fraction of the time-slot. We model the problem of end-to-end (e2e) delay-optimal scheduling as an infinite-horizon average reward Markov decision process (MDP) for users and relays in two separate stages. An online learning approach is then employed to solve the problem in a distributed manner for both users and relays in each phase of transmission. The proposed online stochastic learning solution converges to the optimal solution almost surely (with probability 1) under some realistic conditions. Simulation results show that the proposed approach outperforms the conventional scheduling schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".