MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001178440 · doi:10.1159/000050106

A Simple Technique for Laparoscopic Vertical Banded Gastroplasty – The JOVO Procedure

2001· article· en· W2001178440 on OpenAlexaff
Jacobo Joffe, Andrus Voitk

Bibliographic record

VenueDigestive Surgery · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCurvatures of the stomachStoma (medicine)SurgeryStomachEndoscopyProlene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simple technique for laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty is described. With the surgeon to the patient's left, four trochars are placed as cephalad as possible. Short gastric vessels are divided and the posterior wall of the stomach mobilized. The ETS-Flex with Articulating Head (Ethicon Endosurgery Inc.) is used to divide the stomach close to a 42-french bougie against the lesser curvature. An additional stapler bite abuts directly against a 28-french bougie to obtain correct stoma size. A ribbon of Prolene mesh is pulled through a tunnel behind the stomach at the apex of the divided gastroplasty and sutured around the distal end of the gastroplasty. To date we have used this method successfully in 5 patients with 1-11 months of follow-up. Although we lack a sufficient number of patients or follow-up for definitive conclusions, we believe this technique will produce good results, as it reproduces exactly that used successfully in open surgery and our early results parallel those following open surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigestive SurgerySame topicBariatric Surgery and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207