Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Le poète Gilles Hénault intervient dans la sphère des arts visuels du Québec à plusieurs titres: comme muséologue, critique d'art et communicateur (Société Radio-Canada). En outre, il invite, à maintes reprises, des artistes en arts visuels à illustrer ses recueils de poésie. On tente de saisir ici la spécificité de l'apport de ce poète au champ artistique. L'apport muséologique1 de Gilles Hénault est analysé selon les cadres théoriques de Howard S. Becker2 et de Pierre Bourdieu3 - le premier situe l'individu dans la structure d'un 'réseau de coopération^ et le second prend en compte la "position' socioprofessionnelle de Gilles Hénault. La contribution de celui-ci en tant que critique d'art est abordée par une analyse de contenu de ses textes publiés en particulier dans Vie des arts. Les archives de la SRC nous informent sur les rôles d'inter-vieweur et d'invité qu 'assume le poète.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".