MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New distribution information for Coquillettidia perturbans (Walker) (Diptera, Culicidae) in northern British Columbia, Canada

2011· article· en· W2001187118 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vector Ecology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Northern British Columbia
KeywordsBiologyDistribution (mathematics)ZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The detection of West Nile virus (WNV) in North America in 1999 (Jia et al. 1999) prompted an increased interest in the biology of mosquito species throughout Canada, including the province of British Columbia. Increased funding for research was further fueled by the presence of WNV in neighboring provinces and states. Recent surveys of mosquito diversity have been carried out primarily to determine the geographic distributions of potential WNV vectors and, therefore, to help estimate the risk of WNV infection in human and other populations in various regions of the province (Stephen et al. 2006). While WNV has been the arbovirus emphasized in recent years, improved understanding of mosquito distributions and biology may prove invaluable if other pathogens become threats in the future. In BC, prior to 2003, surveys of mosquito species had been largely restricted to the southern half of the province (Hearle 1927, Belton and Belton 1981). Early results from surveys conducted by the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC) suggested that the estimated geographic ranges for several species in BC were in need of revision. In particular, Coquillettidia (=Mansonia) perturbans, has been described by most authors as having a southerly distribution (Hearle 1927, Wood et al. 1979, Belton and Belton 1981, Belton 1983). This species was trapped as far north as Prince George (53.9°N, 122.8°W) in 2004 (BCCDC 2005). The larvae attach their siphons to the roots of wetland plants, such as cattails (Typha latifolia L.) and obtain oxygen from the root aerenchyma; this habit makes the larvae difficult to catch, monitor or manage (Belton 1983). The cattail marsh habitat type is common throughout British Columbia, especially at low elevations in areas with warm summers (Mackenzie and Moran 2004), suggesting that Cq. perturbans may be far more widely distributed than previously thought. In 2005, 2007, and 2010, surveys were conducted in northern British Columbia (Figure 1) with CDC (Center for Disease Control) miniature light traps fitted with incandescent light bulbs and using dry ice as a source of carbon dioxide for the primary attractant. Traps were placed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it