MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001201285 · doi:10.4161/psb.6.12.18023

Meta-analysis of the expression profiles of the Arabidopsis ESCRT machinery

2011· review· en· W2001201285 on OpenAlexafffund
Lynn G.L. Richardson, Robert T. Mullen

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Signaling & Behavior · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsESCRTBiologyArabidopsisEndosomeCell biologyCytokinesisArabidopsis thalianaProteomeAbscissionComputational biologyGeneticsGeneMutantCell divisionCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport (ESCRT) machinery is a set of multi-protein complexes that are well conserved among all eukaryotes and mediate a remarkable array of cellular processes including late endosome/multivesicular body (MVB) formation, retroviral particle release, and membrane abscission during cytokinesis. While the molecular mechanisms underlying ESCRT function have been relatively well characterized in yeasts and mammals, far less is known about ESCRT in plants. In this study, we utilized publicly-available microarray, massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) and proteome data sets in order to survey the expression profiles of many of the components of the Arabidopsis thaliana ESCRT machinery. Overall, the results indicate that ESCRT expression in Arabidopsis is highly dynamic across a wide range of organs, tissues and treatments, consistent with the complex interplay that likely exists between the spatial and temporal regulation of the ESCRT machinery and the diverse array of roles that ESCRT participates in during plant growth and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Signaling & BehaviorSame topicCellular transport and secretionFrench-language works237,207