Characterization of the PL-I-Related SP2 Protein from <i>Xenopus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The complete cDNA sequence of Xenopus laevis sperm specific proteins SP1 and SP2 has been determined. This information when taken together with N-terminal sequencing and mass spectroscopy data indicates that these two proteins share a product precursor relationship in which SP2 results from cleavage of a short N-terminal peptide of SP1. The secondary and tertiary structures of SP2 have been characterized using circular dichroism and three dimension structure prediction. These structural analyses have conclusively shown that SP1/SP2 proteins are related to proteins of the histone H1 family, particularly to vertebrate histone H1x. Hence, they can be considered bona fide members of the protamine-like- I (PL-I) group of sperm nuclear basic proteins (SNBPs) that have been described in other vertebrate and invertebrate groups. SP2 binds to nucleosomal DNA in a way that is very similar to that of histone H1. However, its interaction with circular DNA does not exhibit an enhanced preference for the supercoiled conformation, and it appears to be mainly driven by ionic interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".