MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001211849 · doi:10.1115/isec2006-99130

Experimental Characterization of a Natural Convection Heat Exchanger for Solar Domestic Hot Water Systems

2006· article· en· W2001211849 on OpenAlexafffund
Cynthia A. Cruickshank, S. J. Harrison

Bibliographic record

VenueSolar Energy · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHeat exchangerMoving bed heat exchangerNatural convectionComputer scienceNTU methodHeat transferProcess engineeringPlate fin heat exchangerMechanicsPlate heat exchangerEnvironmental scienceMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To predict the long-term performance of solar domestic hot water (SDHW) systems requires computational models that can characterize the systems under a range of operating conditions. The development of detailed fundamental models that suitably describe the operation of systems with natural convection heat exchangers is, however, difficult and time consuming. The fact that the natural convection flow through the heat exchanger is intrinsically self-controlling and temperature dependent complicates the analysis. One approach to modeling this type of system is to use performance characteristics, empirically derived from experimental data, to predict the performance of the heat exchanger under typical operating conditions. Unfortunately, a significant number of tests may be required to characterize the full operation of the device. This paper presents a simplified test method that was developed to allow pre-configured SDHW systems that use natural convection heat exchangers, to be characterized. The results of this test method produce performance coefficients for simple empirical expressions that describe the fluid flow and heat transfer in the heat-exchange loop. These empirically derived coefficients are an input to a general simulation routine that allows overall system performance to be determined for various loads and climatic conditions. In this paper, data is presented for a typical heat exchanger under a range of operational conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSolar EnergySame topicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic SystemsFrench-language works237,207