MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001211849 · doi:10.1115/isec2006-99130

Experimental Characterization of a Natural Convection Heat Exchanger for Solar Domestic Hot Water Systems

2006· article· en· W2001211849 on OpenAlex
Cynthia A. Cruickshank, S. J. Harrison

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSolar Energy · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHeat exchangerMoving bed heat exchangerNatural convectionComputer scienceNTU methodHeat transferProcess engineeringPlate fin heat exchangerMechanicsPlate heat exchangerEnvironmental scienceMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To predict the long-term performance of solar domestic hot water (SDHW) systems requires computational models that can characterize the systems under a range of operating conditions. The development of detailed fundamental models that suitably describe the operation of systems with natural convection heat exchangers is, however, difficult and time consuming. The fact that the natural convection flow through the heat exchanger is intrinsically self-controlling and temperature dependent complicates the analysis. One approach to modeling this type of system is to use performance characteristics, empirically derived from experimental data, to predict the performance of the heat exchanger under typical operating conditions. Unfortunately, a significant number of tests may be required to characterize the full operation of the device. This paper presents a simplified test method that was developed to allow pre-configured SDHW systems that use natural convection heat exchangers, to be characterized. The results of this test method produce performance coefficients for simple empirical expressions that describe the fluid flow and heat transfer in the heat-exchange loop. These empirically derived coefficients are an input to a general simulation routine that allows overall system performance to be determined for various loads and climatic conditions. In this paper, data is presented for a typical heat exchanger under a range of operational conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it