MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001217474 · doi:10.1115/1.4006650

Vibration Characteristics of Guided Circular Saws: Experimental and Numerical Analyses

2012· article· en· W2001217474 on OpenAlexaff
Ramin M.H. Khorasany, Ahmad Mohammadpanah, Stanley G. Hutton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of vibration and acoustics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsVibrationMechanicsDisplacement (psychology)Nonlinear systemGalerkin methodAmplitudeDiscretizationNoise (video)Classical mechanicsAcousticsMathematicsMathematical analysisOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studying the vibrational characteristics of guided circular saws is of particular interest in the current study. Guided circular saws are free in both the inner and outer rim. They are restrained from having axial motion by using two space-fixed guide pads in either side of the blade. Because of the small clearance between the guide pads and the saw blade, the blade is capable of having rigid body tilting and a translational degree of freedom. At first, we attempted to develop an understanding regarding the vibrational characteristics of such disks through experimental investigations. An electromagnet was used to generate random white noise for the purpose of exciting the bending waves. Using inductance displacement probes, the frequencies and amplitudes of the disk vibrations were measured and the mean deflections were plotted. In the next step, a space-fixed external force (air jet) was used to excite the disks in the lateral direction. The experimental results indicate that the blade frequencies show a significant change as a result of the initial lateral displacement imposed by the external force. It was also seen that due to the presence of the external force, a stationary wave develops and collapses at a higher speed. For the numerical simulations, the nonlinear governing equations based on Von Kármán plate theory were used. The effect of rigid body degrees of freedom was taken into account. As an approximation, the guide pads were modeled with four space-fixed springs. Using Galerkin’s method, the governing equations were discretized and their equilibrium solutions were found. After linearizing the governing equations around the equilibrium solution, the effect of nonlinearity on the amplitude and frequency response of the guided blade was investigated. It was seen that the numerical results were in close agreement with the experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of vibration and acousticsSame topicAdhesion, Friction, and Surface InteractionsFrench-language works237,207