“What do Kids Know”: A Survey of 420 Grade 5 Students in Cambodia on their Knowledge of Burn Prevention and First-Aid Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cambodia is a developing country of 13 million people where there are an estimated 20,000 burn injuries and 2000 burn deaths annually. Two thirds of the burns occur to children under the age of ten. Since 2000, members of a Canadian regional burn centre have been providing training for Khmer surgeons, nurses, and therapists at an NGO hospital that provides free treatment for disabled people in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The purpose of this study was to determine the knowledge of burn safety and first aid in Grade 5 school children, as a baseline information to design a burn prevention campaign. A 34-question survey was developed to ascertain the knowledge of Cambodian school children regarding burn prevention and first-aid treatment for burn injuries. Additional questions on TV watching habits were included to determine the feasibility of a targeted TV burn education campaign. The survey was translated into Khmer and back-translated into English and pre-tested on a trial class. Informed consent was obtained and the surveys were administered in class with help from trained translators and the teacher.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".