MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001249141 · doi:10.1115/fedsm-icnmm2010-30707

Experimental Investigation of Aerial Spray Characteristics

2010· article· en· W2001249141 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Bagherpour, Gordon Holloway, Ian M. McLeod

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Surface Properties and Treatments
Canadian institutionsForest Protection Limited (Canada)University of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterferometryAerial applicationWind tunnelTrajectoryWakeOpticsWind speedSpray characteristicsWork (physics)Environmental scienceMaterials scienceMechanicsPhysicsAerospace engineeringMeteorologySpray nozzleEngineeringPesticide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An important characteristic of sprays is their statistical distribution of droplet sizes. Knowledge of the droplet distribution is particularly important for pesticide applications because droplet size affects droplet trajectory, probability of contact with foliage, and the biological dose to target pests. This work describes an experimental study of an aerial spray application in a wind tunnel environment at realistic flight speeds (67 m/s) using a full-scale rotary atomizer turning at 8600 rpm. Comparative measurements of water droplet velocity and diameter were made a 3 component Artium Phase Doppler Interferometer (PDI) and a Sympatec Helos Vario Laser Diffraction (LD) instrument. Distance from the atomizer to the measurement cross section was varied to observe the effects of the atomizer wake on the results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant Surface Properties and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207