MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001251227 · doi:10.1089/thy.2010.0297

Screening for Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma with Serum Calcitonin Measurements in Patients with Thyroid Nodules in the United States and Canada

2011· review· en· W2001251227 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gilbert H. Daniels

Bibliographic record

VenueThyroid · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCalcitoninThyroid nodulesThyroid carcinomaThyroidOccultMedullary cavityNodule (geology)PentagastrinThyroidectomyRadiologyMalignancyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare thyroid malignancy with the potential for aggressive behavior. Measurement of serum calcitonin (Ct) in the thyroid nodule population is the most sensitive way to detect occult MTC. An important and controversial question is whether all patients with thyroid nodules should undergo Ct measurements to detect occult MTC. SUMMARY: The prevalence of MTC detected by performing surgery on unselected individuals with thyroid nodules with elevated serum Ct is 0.4%. The central role of pentagastrin (PG) stimulation for triaging patients with minimally elevated serum Ct to prevent unnecessary surgery is reviewed. Data concerning a large reservoir of medullary thyroid microcarcinomas are discussed. CONCLUSION: Given the unavailability of PG in the United States and Canada, the available data argue against routine Ct measurements in all individuals with thyroid nodules in these countries because of the potential for unnecessary surgery and the uncertain benefit in diagnosing medullary microcarcinoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThyroidSame topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207