Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Papillary lesions comprise a wide spectrum of lesions in terms of their clinical presentation, morphologic appearance, malignant potential, and clinical behavior. Their defining feature is that of a fibrovascular stromal core lined by epithelial and myoepithelial cells, attached to the wall of the duct and extending into the duct lumen. Papillary lesions are often diagnostically challenging both on core biopsy and in excision specimens. Much of the difficulty arises from the many different terminologies that are used to describe the various entities that are included under the umbrella term of papillary lesions. Separation of papillary lesions into categories with a meaningful clinical outcome is most appropriate; however, there is a relative paucity of well-designed outcome studies with substantial cohort numbers to provide information in this regard. We use a pragmatic approach to the classification of papillary lesions in our practice, as we will outline in this review. We will also discuss controversies surrounding papillary lesions and focus on management of these lesions on core biopsy and in excision specimens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it