<i>T</i><sub>g</sub> and Rheological Properties of Triazine-Based Molecular Glasses: Incriminating Evidence Against Hydrogen Bonds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bis(mexylamino)triazines have been identified as a family of compounds showing an exceptional propensity to form glassy phases as opposed to crystals. The particularities of this family of compounds are their ability to self-assemble through hydrogen bonding in well-defined patterns to form supramolecular aggregates which pack poorly and the wide range of glass transition temperatures (T(g)) that can be attained through minor structural modifications. Representative bis(mexylamino)triazines were studied by rheology to establish correlations between their rheological properties and their molecular structure, and all compounds were found to behave in a similar fashion except for the temperature at which glass transition takes place. FTIR and NMR spectroscopy experiments were performed on the molecular glasses studied herein; comparisons between the viscosity, T(g), hydrogen bonding, and association constant (K(a)) in CDCl3 solution have revealed a relationship between the rheological properties, the T(g) of the molecular glasses, and the extent and strength of hydrogen bonding present in the material.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".