Manufacturing Landscapes: Place and Community at Glen Bernard Camp, 1924–1933
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De 1924 à 1933, les filles qui séjournaient à Glen Bernard – un camp d’été privé pour filles dans la zone nord du prestigieux pays des chalets de l’Ontario, la région de Muskoka – composaient des récits et des poèmes à lire au cercle hebdomadaire du conseil. Plusieurs de leurs compositions, qui brossent un aperçu de la vie au camp, paraissaient tous les ans dans The Scroll . Une bonne partie du savoir actuel sur le camping du début du XX e siècle au Canada et aux États-Unis accrédite le regard des adultes, or l’essai que voici soutient que The Scroll montre comment les filles qui fréquentaient le camp percevaient leur propre expérience, cultivaient un sentiment d’appartenance et délimitaient leur collectivité. S’ils étaient le produit de structures conçues et mises en place par des directeurs et des conseillers, les camps d’été étaient également façonnés par les pratiques spatiales et sociales des filles qui en habitaient les cabines, en battaient les sentiers et s’y rassemblaient autour des feux de camp.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".