Quantitative Screening of Stilbenes and Zeranol and Its Related Residues and Natural Precursors in Veal Liver by Gas Chromatography−Mass Spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An existing gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-based quantitative screening method for the regulatory analysis of the resorcylic acid lactones zeranol, taleranol, and zearalanone and the stilbene anabolic steroids diethylstilbestrol and dienestrol was extended to include natural precursors of zeranol (zearalenone, alpha-zearalenol, and beta-zearalenol) in veal liver. No changes in sample preparation were required; the instrumental conditions were selected to effect a suitable chromatographic separation and detection of the analytes. Validation experiments were performed to verify the performance and applicability of the extended method for the quantitative screening of the original and additional analytes in veal liver in the concentration range from 0.5 to 2.0 microg/kg. The limits of detection were 0.08-0.19 microg/kg. The limits of quantitation were 0.27-0.64 microg/kg. Recoveries were 29-67%. Combined relative measurement uncertainty estimates were 6-21%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".