MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001297076 · doi:10.1080/07408170309342346

Optimal production control problem in stochastic multiple-product multiple-machine manufacturing systems

2003· article· en· W2001297076 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Gharbi, Jean‐Pierre Kenné

Bibliographic record

VenueIIE Transactions · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du QuébecUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParameterized complexityMathematical optimizationProduction (economics)Optimal controlProduct (mathematics)Production controlComputer scienceProduct typeControl variableControl (management)Holding costEngineeringMathematicsAlgorithmEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the issue of production control in a manufacturing system with multiple machines which are subject to breakdowns and repairs. The control variables considered are the production rates for different products on the machines. Our objective is to minimize the expected total discounted cost due to the finished good inventories and backlogs. Based on the structure of the hedging point policy, a parameterized near-optimal production policy for a multiple-product manufacturing system is proposed. The analytical formalism is combined with simulation-based statistical tools, such as experimental design and response surface methodology. The aim of such a combination is to provide an approximation of the optimal control policy. In the proposed approach, the parameterized near-optimal control policy is used as an input for the simulation model. For each entry consisting of a combination of parameters, the cost incurred is obtained. The significant effects of the control variables are determined by the experimental design. The relationship between the cost and these input factors is obtained through a response surface model. It is from the obtained relationship that the best values of control factors are determined. Extensive computational experience is reported for two-part-type and five-part-type production systems. Finally, simulation experiments on several examples are concentrated on the sensitivities of the control policy obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIIE TransactionsSame topicAdvanced Statistical Process MonitoringFrench-language works237,207