MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001330753 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2010.5575128

Influence of distributed generation interface transformer and DG configurations on Temporary Overvoltage (TOV)

2010· article· en· W2001330753 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsHydro One (Canada)Western University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformerOvervoltageInverterDistributed generationVoltageEngineeringElectrical engineeringGroundDistribution transformerComputer scienceElectronic engineeringRenewable energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the impact of Distributed Generator Interface Transformer (DGIT) configuration on Temporary Over Voltage (TOV) on the healthy phases in a distribution feeder during an unsymmetrical fault. Three common types of transformer configurations are investigated both analytically and using EMTDC/PSCAD. Subsequently, an in-depth study of the effectiveness of grounding transformer in reducing the TOVs for both rotating machine based DG and inverter based DG has been performed. All these studies have been performed on study systems with realistic system data. The results of studies presented in this paper are expected to be helpful for utilities in assessing the impact of integration of distributed generators in their system and avoiding scenarios of high TOVs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIslanding Detection in Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207