Coulomb Fission Event Resolved Progeny Droplet Production from Isolated Evaporating Methanol Droplets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An electrodynamic balance was used to levitate a single methanol droplet while it evaporated down to, and just beyond, its first encountered Coulomb fission limit as ascertained by the time dependence of its laser light scatter signal. At its Coulomb limit, the primary droplet fragmented and approximately 81% of its net charge was released in the form of small droplets that are termed progeny. The window of time over which the progeny droplets were ejected from the electrodynamic balance was deltat = 850 ms, indicating that these droplets were formed with a range of mass-to-charge values. An average of 13.2 (+/-4.4) progeny droplets were detected as a result of this fragmentation event. On the assumption that the average initial radius of the progeny droplets were one-tenth the radius of the droplet undergoing the Coulomb fission event, approximately 50% of the total net charge ejected would not have been carried by the 13 progeny droplets detected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".