MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001337743 · doi:10.1063/1.481479

The electronic spectrum of germanium methylidyne (GeCH), the prototypical organogermanium compound

2000· article· en· W2001337743 on OpenAlexaff
Tony C. Smith, Haiyang Li, Dennis J. Clouthier, Christopher T. Kingston, A. J. Merer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotopomersGermaniumExcited stateChemistryTriple bondBond lengthDouble bondChemical bondAtomic physicsMolecular electronic transitionCrystallographyGround stateCrystal structureMoleculePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The à 2Σ+–X̃ 2Πi electronic transition of jet-cooled germanium methylidyne has been recorded in the 730–555 nm region by laser-induced fluorescence techniques. The radical was produced in a pulsed electric discharge using tetramethylgermane as the precursor. The band system consists of perpendicular and vibronically induced parallel bands with upper state frequencies of ν2′=638/497 cm−1 and ν3′=990/952 cm−1 for GeCH/GeCD. The Σ+2–2Π3/2 components of the 000 bands of GeCH and GeCD and the 201 band of GeCH have been recorded with sufficient resolution to assign the transitions of the Ge70, Ge72, Ge74, and Ge76 isotopomers. The rotational constants of the various hydrogen and germanium isotopomers were used to derive the following molecular structures: r0″(Ge–C)=1.775 79(21) Å, r0″(C–H)=1.0673(12) Å, r0′(Ge–C)=1.673 66(8) Å, and r0′(C–H)=1.0589(5) Å. The ground state germanium–carbon bond length is typical for a Ge=C double bond, but in the excited state it corresponds to a triple bond. This is a consequence of promotion of an electron from a nonbonding σ orbital to a π bonding orbital to form the …σ1π4(2Σ+) excited state. In this study we provide the first experimental value for the length of the germanium–carbon triple bond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207