MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001349313 · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/37/7/075105

Rotational bands in the semi-magic nucleus<sup>57</sup><sub>28</sub>Ni<sub>29</sub>

2010· article· en· W2001349313 on OpenAlexaff
D. Rudolph, I. Ragnarsson, W. Reviol, C. Andreoiu, M. A. Bentley, M. P. Carpenter, R. J. Charity, R. M. Clark, M. Cromaz, J. Ekman, C. Fahlander, P. Fallon, E. Ideguchi, A. O. Macchiavelli, M Mineva, D. G. Sarantites, D. Seweryniak, Spencer J. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFSimon Fraser University
FundersScience and Technology Facilities Council
KeywordsGammaspherePhysicsNeutronIsotopeAtomic physicsNucleusProtonNickelSpin (aerodynamics)MAGIC (telescope)Excited stateChemistryNuclear physicsAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract\nTwo rotational bands have been identified and characterized in the proton-magic N = Z + 1 nucleus 57 Ni. These bands complete the systematics of well- and superdeformed rotational bands in the light nickel isotopes starting from doubly-magic 56 Ni to 60 Ni. High-spin states in 57 Ni have been produced in the fusion-evaporation reaction 28 Si(32 S, 2p1n) 57 Ni and studied with the ?-ray detection array Gammasphere operated in conjunction with detectors for evaporated light charged particles and neutrons. The features of the rotational bands in 57 Ni are compared to those of neighbouring isotopes and interpreted by means of configurationdependent cranked Nilsson-Strutinsky calculations. The two observed high-spin bands are considered signature partners and assigned to configurations with one 1g 9/2 proton and one 1g 9/2 neutron, resulting in an unambiguous understanding of the energetically favoured signature ? = ?1/2 band but a somewhat less satisfactory description of the signature ? = +1/2 band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle PhysicsSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207