Agent behavior and agent models in unregulated markets
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile-agent systems show significant promise as the most effective way to harness the power of the Internet and the massive collection of information and opportunity that the Internet holds. However the efficient organization and control of these systems remains one of a number of unsolved problems with this approach to network computing. This paper examines a mobile-agent system with specific focus on environment sensing, preemptive load balancing and open agent markets. Agent behaviour is studied with actual agent systems using progressively sophisticated agent migration strategies.It is shown that actual modeling shows interesting and difficult to predict behaviour in the agent systems. It is shown that mobile agents with relatively simple migration strategies can cause loads in self-regulating agent markets to oscillate. It is further shown that using Autoregressive modeling to predict the market behaviour can allow individual agents to significantly outperform other agents. However the fidelity of the model is critical to the success of the agents. The criticality of good agent strategies and actual agent system modeling is thus highlighted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it