MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimal energy management for building microgrid with constrained renewable energy utilization

2014· article· en· W2001460357 on OpenAlexaff
Hieu Trung Nguyen, Long Bao Le

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridRenewable energyComputer scienceEnergy managementEnergy storageEnergy engineeringDemand responseElectricityEnvironmental economicsEnergy (signal processing)EngineeringPower (physics)Electrical engineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the energy management for a building microgrid considering a probabilistic constraint on the renewable energy utilization. Facilitated by the microgrid technology with integrated renewable energy resources, we assume that the building microgrid can participate in the electricity market to efficiently utilize the renewable energy and reduce electricity cost. In this paper, we develop an optimal energy management framework for the building microgrid considering various building loads, renewable energy, storage facility, and a natural gas combined heat and power (CHP) system. In addition, we employ the chance constrained and two-stage stochastic programming approach in our design to ensure efficient utilization of the renewable energy and to capture various system uncertainties. The proposed solution addresses the risk that available renewable energy may not be fully utilized due to its intermittent nature. Extensive numerical results are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.876

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207