Early activation and redistribution of calpain activity in skeletal muscle during hindlimb unweighting and reweighting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aims of this study were the following: (i) to determine whether activation of the Ca2+-activated protease, calpain, is an early event during hindlimb unweighting (HU) in skeletal muscle; and (ii) to assess whether calpain activity is greater during reweighting compared with HU alone. Rats were exposed to 12, 24, and 72 h, or 9 d of HU, followed by reweighting for 0, 12, or 24 h. Calpain activities were assayed for total, soluble, and particulate fractions. Total calpain activity was increased in the soleus at all HU time points, whereas activities were elevated in the gastrocnemius only after 9 d of HU. With reweighting, calpain activity remained elevated at all time points for both muscles. In general, reweighting the gastrocnemius increased its calpain activity more than during HU only, whereas reweighting the soleus did not produce additional increases in its calpain activity. The increases in calpain activity were associated with a proportional increase in activity of the particulate (membrane- and protein-associated) fraction. The results suggest that calpain activation is an early event during HU in the soleus, and that the increases in calpain activity in both muscles are associated with a redistribution of activity from cytosolic to particulate fractions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".