MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001491642 · doi:10.1021/ac901052v

Derivatization of Optically Transparent Materials with Diazonium Reagents for Spectroscopy of Buried Interfaces

2009· article· en· W2001491642 on OpenAlexafffund
Amr M. Mahmoud, Adam Johan Bergren, Richard L. McCreery

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsNational Institute for NanotechnologyUniversity of Alberta
FundersFaculty of Pharmacy, Cairo UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsChemistryDerivatizationReagentDiazonium CompoundsSpectroscopyOptically activeOrganic chemistryPhotochemistryHigh-performance liquid chromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a method to derivatize a wide variety of substrate materials that are frequently used in spectroscopic characterizations with molecular layers through the reduction of aromatic diazonium reagents. The method relies on an ultrathin (5 nm) layer of a reactive metal (e.g., Ti or Al) deposited as a primer that subsequently mediates the reduction of aromatic diazonium reagents from acetonitrile solution. Following surface modification, the Ti can be oxidized to provide a passivated support surface. Raman, Infrared, UV-vis and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic techniques are used to characterize the molecular layers on the metal primer surface. When a Ti primer layer is derivatized via diazonium reduction, the molecule is shown to be present on the ultrathin Ti layer on Au, Al, quartz, Si/SiO(x), glass, and polyethylene surfaces. For molecules bound to a Ti primer, the molecular layer was found to be stable to sonication in acetone or acetonitrile, a 1 h exposure to boiling water, and a 30 min exposure to 0.1 M acid or base. The approach also permits spectroscopic characterization of buried thin-film molecular layers on optically transparent substrates after deposition of thick top metal contacts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207