MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The consolidation of mud-silk: A Southeast Asian textile

2014· article· en· W2001505654 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Conservation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSILKSoutheast asiaTextileOrange (colour)ChinaConsolidation (business)ArchaeologyGeographyAncient historyMaterials scienceHistoryComposite materialBiologyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mud-silk, a fabric made in Southeast China and other areas of Southeast Asia, was recently identified in museum collections in Hawaii and Canada. The fabric is characterised by a glossy black or dark-brown surface finish, achieved by spreading iron-rich river mud on silk dyed with a tannin-rich dye. Still produced and used by fashion designers today, little research has been done regarding its specific preservation requirements.
\nMuseums in Hawaii and Canada found that until recently mud-silk had been unacknowledged or misrepresented in their collections, and it is likely that this is common in collections worldwide. As mud-silk becomes more widely known and comes to light in other collections, more information will be needed on its care and preservation. During a survey of mud-silk garments at the Royal British Columbia (BC) Museum, Canada, the author noted that one mud-silk jacket had a flaking surface coating. The coating was highly unstable, with tiny flakes detaching and shedding whenever the jacket was handled. While the problem was not common, it severely affected the preservation of and ability to handle the affected jacket. The pressing conservation needs of this mud-silk jacket sparked the current investigation, which aims to explore methods for consolidating a flaking mud-silk coating while minimally affecting the fabric’s flexibility and appearance.
\nThe paper aims to contribute to the conservation literature in two ways. Firstly, one conservation aspect of a little-researched, culturally significant Southeast Asian textile will be discussed and practical solutions provided. Secondly, research into the consolidation of a thin surface coating, similar to a paint film, on a flexible textile will add to research previously undertaken on the conservation of painted flags and banners. The techniques investigated will add to the toolkit of textile conservators faced with an unstable film on a textile, whether it is paint or another kind of surface finish, where it is imperative that the textile retains its flexibility.
\nThis paper will discuss attempts to recreate the flaking condition on non-damaged mud-silk. Description of consolidation tests carried out and results from these tests will show which consolidants and techniques are effective at stabilising a flaky surface film on a flexible textile. Special emphasis will be placed on consolidation application techniques (e.g. brushing or spraying) and solution properties (e.g. volatility), as these are areas that have not been well explored in textile conservation. Evaluations of the effect of successful consolidation methods on the flexibility and appearance of mud-silk will be discussed, with a view to providing options for the consolidation of flaky mud-silk while minimally affecting its physical properties. This will provide a practical solution to the conservation issue noted at the Royal BC Museum that can also be applied to other textiles with flaky surface films.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it