MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2001506720 · doi:10.1086/321686

High‐Latitude H<scp>i</scp>in NGC 2613: Structure and Dynamics

2001· article· en· W2001506720 on OpenAlexaff
Tara Chaves, J. Irwin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyAstronomyBarred spiral galaxyInteracting galaxySpiral galaxyGalaxy formation and evolution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies of edge-on spiral galaxies have revealed a number of cases in which kiloparsec-scale H I features extend from the disk into the halo region. We have obtained VLA CnB array 21 cm H I observations of NGC 2613, an edge-on spiral galaxy 26 Mpc away. We report that NGC 2613 is an extremely massive galaxy with a nearby companion galaxy (ESO 495-G017). We present the first H I maps and masses for this companion. We have found three high-latitude features above the plane, symmetric in projection with three below the plane in NGC 2613. All six features show a multiple velocity structure, with several "spurs," as well as a trend to lag behind the disk gas with increasing distance from the plane. The radio continuum emission shows two large extensions associated with a strong continuum source in the disk. These are the highest latitude discrete features clearly connected to a spiral galaxy yet detected in radio continuum. Moreover, two of the H I features show a strong correlation with these large continuum extensions, with the continuum arranged on the perimeter of the H I. We postulate that these features were formed by some mechanism internal to the galaxy, possibly by spatially correlated supernovae or by the action of a preexisting relativistic jet flowing through the plane of the galaxy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→