MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Process Simulation of a Liquefaction Process of Nature Gas with a Supersonic Swirling Separator

2012· article· en· W2001515139 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heng Sun, Zeng Cai Li, Hong Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSeparator (oil production)LiquefactionNozzleLiquefied natural gasSupersonic speedNatural gasWaste managementPetroleum engineeringEngineeringProcess engineeringNuclear engineeringMechanical engineeringAerospace engineeringThermodynamicsPhysicsGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3S separator which has been widely employed in separation of gas mixtures can greatly reduce the temperature of natural gas when it expands in a Laval nozzle. The gas through the separator can not be totally liquefied due to the special working mechanism of the separator. A novel liquefaction process with a supersonic swirling separator is presented and simulated. The process can liquefy all the crude gas by re-cycling the gas which is not liquefied at the outlet of the separator. The simulations show it can get relatively high energy efficiency and could be competitive in many cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicSpacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207