MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001552241 · doi:10.1080/07315170903152748

Effect of Particle Size on the Dielectric Properties of Sodium Potassium Niobate -Portland Cement Composites

2009· article· en· W2001552241 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ruamporn Potong, Rattiyakorn Rianyoi, Parkpoom Jarupoom, Kamonpan Pengpat, Arnon Chaipanich

Bibliographic record

VenueFerroelectrics Letters Section · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCommission on Higher EducationMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsMaterials sciencePotassium niobateComposite materialDielectricParticle sizeDielectric lossPortland cementParticle (ecology)PiezoelectricityComposite numberMineralogyCementFerroelectricity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research, the effect of sodium potassium niobate, (Na0.5K0.5)NbO3 (NKN) particle size on the dielectric properties of 0-3 non lead based piezoelectric cement based composites were investigated. NKN of various particle sizes (75, 225 and 450 μm) were used at 50% by volume to produce the composites. Dielectric properties at various frequencies (0.1–20 kHz) were investigated. The results showed that the dielectric values of NKN-PC composites increased with increasing NKN particle size where ε r at 1 kHz are 158.60 and 191.21 for composites with 75 μm and 450 μm NKN particle size respectively. The dielectric loss (tanδ) was found to reduce with increasing NKN particle size and the tan δ value was lowest at 0.39 for composite with 450 μm NKN particle size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFerroelectrics Letters SectionSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207