Formate-Dependent Autotrophic Growth in <i>Sinorhizobium meliloti</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It was found that S. meliloti strain SmA818, which is cured of pSymA, could not grow on defined medium containing only formate and bicarbonate as carbon sources. Growth experiments showed that Rm1021 was capable of formate/bicarbonate-dependent growth, suggesting that it was capable of autotrophic-type growth. The annotated genome of S. meliloti Rm1021 contains three formate dehydrogenase genes. A systematic disruption of each of the three formate dehydrogenase genes, as well as the genes encoding determinants of the Calvin-Benson-Bassham, cycle was carried out to determine which of these determinants played a role in growth on this defined medium. The results showed that S. meliloti is capable of formate-dependent autotrophic growth. Formate-dependent autotrophic growth is dependent on the presence of the chromosomally located fdsABCDG operon, as well as the cbb operon carried by pSymB. Growth was also dependent on the presence of either of the two triose-phosphate isomerase genes (tpiA or tpiB) that are found in the genome. In addition, it was found that fdoGHI carried by pSymA encodes a formate dehydrogenase that allows Rm1021 to carry out formate-dependent respiration. Taken together, the data allow us to present a model of how S. meliloti can grow on defined medium containing only formate and bicarbonate as carbon sources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".