MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001572656 · doi:10.1145/1358183.1358185

Irreducible polynomials and barker sequences

2007· article· en· W2001572656 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM communications in computer algebra · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersDivision of Computing and Communication Foundations
KeywordsMathematicsIrreducibilityCombinatoricsSequence (biology)ConjecturePrime (order theory)ModuloInteger (computer science)Discrete mathematicsPolynomialDegree (music)Pure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Barker sequence is a finite sequence a o , ..., a n -1 , each term ±1, for which every sum Σ i a i a i +k with 0 < k < n is either 0, 1, or -- 1. It is widely conjectured that no Barker sequences of length n > 13 exist, and this conjecture has been verified for the case when n is odd. We show that in this case the problem can in fact be reduced to a question of irreducibility for a certain family of univariate polynomials: No Barker sequence of length 2 m + 1 exists if a particular integer polynomial of degree 4 m is irreducible over Q. A proof of irreducibility for this family would thus provide a short, alternative proof that long Barker sequences of odd length do not exist. However, we also prove that the polynomials in question are always reducible modulo p , for every prime p .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it