MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001575904 · doi:10.1080/15700760902737212

Epilogue: Reflections on the Articles in this Issue

2009· article· en· W2001575904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLeadership and Policy in Schools · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTeacher Education and Leadership Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdministration (probate law)Rest (music)Library scienceWork (physics)Political scienceSociologyPsychologyComputer scienceLawMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. A significant amount of this work has been summarized in Leithwood & Steinbach (1995) Leithwood, K. and Steinbach, R., eds. 1995. Expert problem solving: Evidence from school and district leaders, Albany, NY: SUNY Press. [Google Scholar]. The rest appears in individual journal articles. See, for example, the special issue of Educational Administration Quarterly (Hallinger & Leithwood, 1993 Hallinger, P. and Leithwood, K., eds. 1993. “Cognitive perspectives on educational administration [Special issue]”. In Educational Administration Quarterly Vol. 29, (3) [Google Scholar]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.374
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.105 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it