MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001591294 · doi:10.1093/brain/awt009

Bilateral pallidal stimulation in cervical dystonia: blinded evidence of benefit beyond 5 years

2013· article· en· W2001591294 on OpenAlexaffabout
Richard A. Walsh, Christos Sidiropoulos, Andrés M. Lozano, Mojgan Hodaie, Yu‐Yan Poon, Melanie Fallis, Elena Moro

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCervical dystoniaSpasmodic TorticollisDeep brain stimulationMedicineDystoniaProspective cohort studyBotulinum toxinNeurological disorderCentral nervous system diseaseAnesthesiaTorticollisSurgeryInternal medicineParkinson's disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The local injection of botulinum toxin is accepted as the first-line treatment of primary cervical dystonia. This approach provides adequate symptomatic relief for most patients, but up to one-third will have an unsatisfactory response. Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus has been increasingly used in dystonic syndromes that are refractory to best pharmacological approaches. Although cervical dystonia is the most common idiopathic focal dystonia, evidence for long-term responsiveness to pallidal stimulation is limited. The primary objective of this study was to prospectively collect outcome data from baseline to last clinical follow-up on patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia treated with bilateral pallidal stimulation. Blinded video assessment of examinations performed preoperatively and at last video assessment were performed. Ten patients had complete prospective clinical follow-up. Baseline total Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale score (±standard deviation) was 54.5 ± 12.4 (range, 35.0-70.3). Comparison of the blinded severity sub-score on baseline video and at last video assessment at a mean of 7.7 years postoperatively demonstrated a mean improvement of 47.6% (P = 0.002) and strong inter-observer correlation between blinded raters (Spearman r = 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.92, P = 0.0001). All 10 patients had 5 years of open prospective follow-up, documenting a 47.4 ± 26.4% (P < 0.01) mean improvement with respect to baseline. This was maintained at a mean of 7.8 years at last follow-up after surgery (range, 4.9-10.7 years) with a 54.4 ± 27.4% mean improvement (P < 0.01). Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus is an effective and long-lasting second-line treatment of cervical dystonia, with benefit in some of our patients extending to >10 years. More data are needed to explain variations in individual responses and to guide individual programming parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207