Pen and Brush in Dialogue: Octavio Paz and Antoni Tàpies in their Transatlantic <i>Livre d'Artiste</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper interprets the interaction between painting and language from the respective political contexts of Catalan artist and Mexican poet in Antoni Tapies' livre d'artiste, Petrificada petrificante (Maeght Gallery, 1978) of the poem of the same title by Octavio Paz. I argue that in this little-known art book the artist emphasizes along with Paz the need to revise language and symbols to find appropriate representations to reflect the contemporary city. This transatlantic cultural product establishes a dialogue, not only between word and art but also between artistic perspectives that respond to socio-political currents in Spain and Mexico of the 1970s.Este articulo interpreta la interaccion entre el lenguaje y la pintura desde el contexto politico del artista catalan y del poeta mexicano, respectivamente, en el livre d'artiste de Antoni Tapies (Maeght Gallery, 1978) del poema, Petrificada petrificante, de Octavio Paz. Argumento que, en este livre d'artiste poco conocido, el artista subraya junto a Paz...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".