Pen and Brush in Dialogue: Octavio Paz and Antoni Tàpies in their Transatlantic <i>Livre d'Artiste</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper interprets the interaction between painting and language from the respective political contexts of Catalan artist and Mexican poet in Antoni Tapies' livre d'artiste, Petrificada petrificante (Maeght Gallery, 1978) of the poem of the same title by Octavio Paz. I argue that in this little-known art book the artist emphasizes along with Paz the need to revise language and symbols to find appropriate representations to reflect the contemporary city. This transatlantic cultural product establishes a dialogue, not only between word and art but also between artistic perspectives that respond to socio-political currents in Spain and Mexico of the 1970s.Este articulo interpreta la interaccion entre el lenguaje y la pintura desde el contexto politico del artista catalan y del poeta mexicano, respectivamente, en el livre d'artiste de Antoni Tapies (Maeght Gallery, 1978) del poema, Petrificada petrificante, de Octavio Paz. Argumento que, en este livre d'artiste poco conocido, el artista subraya junto a Paz...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it