"One's Terms Defy One's Arguments": The Metaphoric Framing of "UNIVERSITY AS COMMUNITY" and "UNIVERSITY AS BUSINESS" in the Second Report of the Task Force on Strategic Planning at the University of Manitoba
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Schön (1993) suggested that social policy problems often are framed in terms of metaphors-metaphors that affect both how problems are viewed and their possible solutions. He also highlighted how conflicting metaphoric frames can impede the resolution of these situations. Supplementing Schön's ideas with Lakoff and Johnson's (1980) discussion of conceptual metaphors, I argue that the 1997 University of Manitoba Task Force on Strategic Planning's second report, Transformation: Continuity and Change, represents such a conflict in its inability to reconcile the metaphors "UNIVERSITY AS BUSINESS" and "UNIVERSITY AS COMMUNITY." This case study is particularly relevant at a time when the process of restructuring is going on in many institutions and organizations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it