Very high-dose methotrexate (33.6 g/m<sup>2</sup>) as central nervous system preventive therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of National Cancer Institute/Children's Cancer Group trials CCG-191P, CCG-134P and CCG-144P
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Between 1977 and 1991, the Children's Cancer Group and the National Cancer Institute conducted three trials of very high-dose methotrexate (33.6 g/m2; VHD-MTX) in place of cranial radiation (CRT) as central nervous system (CNS) preventive therapy, and assessed efficacy, acute toxicity and long-term neurocognitive outcome. CCG-191P compared VHD-MTX to CRT plus intrathecal methotrexate (IT-MTX) in 181 patients and demonstrated equivalent survival. However, patients treated with CRT had poorer performance on neurocognitive testing over time. CCG-134P evaluated the addition of intensified systemic and intrathecal therapy to VHD-MTX in 128 patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and demonstrated reduced CNS relapse compared to the CCG-191P trial, but equivalent survival. CCG-144P compared VHD-MTX to IT-MTX alone in 175 patients with average-risk ALL and demonstrated equivalent survival. VHD-MTX was associated with significant toxicities, particularly neutropenia, transient hepatic dysfunction and sepsis. VHD-MTX achieved similar survival to other CNS-directed therapies without the long-term impact on intelligence, but with substantial acute toxicities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".